|
The Bertrand Russell Society Board of Directors annual meeting took place Friday, June 18 from 8:45-9:15 p.m. Directors in attendance were Ken Blackwell, David Blitz, Rosalind Carey, Peter Friedman, David Goldman, Nick Griffin, Dave Henehan, Ray Perkins, Steve Reinhardt, Cara Rice, Alan Schwerin, Warren Allen Smith, Peter Stone, Chad Trainer, and Thom Weidlich. The Board’s first item of business was the selection of an interim chair. Ken Blackwell agreed to act in this capacity. Alan Schwerin then moved to approve the Treasurer’s report and the minutes from last year’s meeting. Rosalind Carey seconded the motion, and they were approved unanimously. Nicholas Griffin moved to re-elect the current members of the executive committee. Ray Perkins seconded the motion, and it was approved by acclamation. Nicholas Griffin nominated Peter Friedman to the position of vice-president for international outreach. Warren Allen Smith seconded the nomination and it was unanimously approved. Peter Friedman indicated his interest in John Ongley working as a vice-president of outreach in North America. Peter Friedman also explained recent web-based developments and progress that had been made as a result of access to other organizations’ membership lists. Still on the issue of outreach, Alan Schwerin wished to know the United Kingdom’s counterpart to the American Philosophical Association, and Nick Griffin answered that it was the Joint Session of the Aristotelian Society and Mind Association. Schwerin stressed the need to “tap into this pool”. Nicholas Griffin detailed the structural nature and limits of the Joint Session of the Aristotelian Society and Mind Association, and Alan Schwerin encouraged Peter Friedman to take on the challenge to make some headway in this area, with Ray Perkins noting the reverence Russell still enjoys in Britain. Advertisements as a means of outreach were mentioned, and ads in British journals were discussed. Rosalind Carey nominated John Ongley for vice-president of North American outreach. Warren Allen Smith seconded the nomination and it passed with acclamation. The site of next year’s BRS annual meeting was discussed next. Nicholas Griffin volunteered McMaster University as the host university so that the BRS could meet alongside the Russell versus Meinong conference (May 14-18, 2005) commemorating the centennial of Russell’s essay ‘On Denoting’. Ray Perkins expressed concern with possible scheduling conflicts between the timing of the proposed McMaster meeting and university examination periods in the U.S. Rosalind Carey mentioned Lehman as an option at some future point, and also mentioned Pace University (John Ongley’s school) as a possibility, that, unlike Lehman, possesses dormitories. Attention was drawn to Gregory Landini’s offer at the 2003 meeting to have the University of Iowa host the 2005 meeting. David Blitz suggested that Nick Griffin’s presence at the 2004 meeting, and Nick’s express willingness to host the meeting, should prevail. Peter Stone suggested that the merits to meeting at McMaster the same year they were commemorating the centennial of Russell’s ‘On Denoting’ essay there were strong and obvious to him, and that Landini would probably concur. Alan Schwerin indicated his willingness to obtain a formal clarification from Landini. Concern was expressed about excessively technical papers resulting from the Russell vs. Meinong conference’s focus on ‘On Denoting’. Alan Schwerin assured those concerned that the BRS meeting’s papers would in no way be bound by the Russell vs. Meinong conference’s criteria. David Blitz moved to have McMaster University designated as the host of the BRS 2005 meeting. Ros-alind Carey seconded the motion, and it carried without opposition. Rosalind Carey indicated concern for the funding of the Bertrand Russell Society Quarterly. The editors were given to understand that the BRS would contribute about $750/issue. Following the editors’ procurement of a $3000 grant from Lehman College (received last fall to improve the Quarterly), less than $750/issue of BRS money was used by them on the past 3 issues. The editors wished to clarify their assumption that BRS money, allocated to the Quarterly for the year but not used, could be drawn on in the coming year if they wanted to spend upwards of $750 of BRS money per issue. An additional reason for thinking more than $750 of BRS money could be spent in the future was that when discussing how much could be spent per issue David White had said that the editors could go over $750/issue if it made the Quarterly better looking. Right now there is a relative surplus in the BRS account due to the editors having spent less BRS money for the Quarterly than usual. Rosalind Carey expressed her hope that the present surplus of money would not be spent in other ways by the Society but would be saved for them in the coming year. She then indicated her interest in a motion clarifying that residual monies from the production of a given issue of the Quarterly could accumulate, or “carry over”, to production of subsequent issues, as opposed to a “use it-or-lose it” scenario. Ken Blackwell assured Rosalind Carey that this would not be controversial, Alan Schwerin assured Rosalind Carey that a motion was not necessary, and Rosalind Carey requested that this understanding be made part of the minutes. The Quarterly’s editors had expressed their desire to spread out the aforementioned grant because they had not had time this year to look for further funding for next year. (It was explained that such applications have to be made a year in advance.) They reported that they will be looking this summer for more funding for the year after next. They suggested the possibility of a general BRS fundraising drive of which their own efforts to find money for the Quarterly would be a part – with perhaps the partial goal of creating an endowment for the BRS. Nick Griffin seconded the motion, and it passed by acclamation. In order that he could introduce a motion of his own, at this point, Ken Blackwell temporarily removed himself as acting chairman and was replaced by Alan Schwerin. Ken Blackwell explained that it had been 4 years since the BRS last agreed to an increase in the special rate for Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies. The BRS has been paying $17 postpaid per member, including most honorary members, and in 2000 that was 63% of the regular individual rate of $27. In common with many academic journals in the electronic age, Russell has lost subscriptions while printing and mailing costs have increased. In 2003 the rate went up to $32 and in 2004 to $35. An increase to $21 would main-tain the BRS rate at 60% of the regular rate. Additional costs include creating an electronic version for direct library reference, and putting all the back issues since 1971 on the web and making them searchable. Ken Blackwell said he is investigating means of doing this, and he further said that it would surely assist the study of Russell, given that very few Society members have journal sets extending back that far. The electronic version may bring new revenue, but that remains to be seen. Ken Blackwell moved to raise the BRS’s special subscription rate for Russell to $21 starting this year. Thom Weidlich seconded the motion, and it passed unanimously. The issue of declining membership was raised next. Peter Friedman mentioned that the Russell Society’s current Web site (http://www.users.drew.edu/~jlenz/brs.html) is out of date. To reach “critical mass”, regular assistance with his own BRS site, (http://www.bertrandrussellsociety.org/default.asp?STID=1), he said, will be necessary. The overall indication from the Board was that investigation and evaluation of this new site was of genuine interest. Friedman was careful to stress that volunteers would be crucial to the site’s maintenance. Ken Blackwell made a motion to assist Peter Friedman in “creating a new BRS Web site by disclosing the URL to the Board of Directors with the intent that the Board will vote on replacing the current Web site in due course.” Peter Friedman seconded the motion, and it passed unanimously. Finally, Ray Perkins and Peter Stone made a motion to introduce a motion proposing a resolution from the BRS condemning the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq. The resolution read: The Bertrand Russell Society condemns the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq as contrary to the principles of international law, which Bertrand Russell advocated throughout his long life. Given the shameful role the U.S. government has played in the region – from its years of support for Saddam Hussein to its contemptuous refusal to submit to U.N. jurisdiction in matters of war and peace – the Society is suspicious of any U.S. effort to maintain control of the destiny of Iraq. Accordingly, the Society calls for an immediate withdrawal, under UN auspices, of U.S. forces in Iraq and for the concurrent establishment, also under UN auspices, of a democratic secular state by the Iraqi people themselves.David Blitz seconded the motion, and it passed by a vote of 13 to 2. Peter Stone moved to end the Board meeting, Alan Schwerin seconded the motion, and it carried without opposition.
|